Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Nokia 7.2, having an 81 score against 75.9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a newer 11 version while Nokia 7.2 has Android 10, providing a couple additional features and enhanced performance. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is a better cellphone than Nokia 7.2, it must be noted that it's also somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a CPU that is just as good as the CPU in Nokia 7.2, and although the Galaxy XCover Pro has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a screen that's very similar to the screen in Nokia 7.2, both of them have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a better quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a same size screen.
Nokia 7.2 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for shooting images or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia 7.2 also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
The Nokia 7.2 counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia 7.2 also has 128 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features improved battery lifetime than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.