Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than Nokia 7.2's 75.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is thinner but a little bit heavier than Nokia 7.2, and both of them were only released with a few months difference. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better screen than Nokia 7.2, because it has a quite larger screen, a just a bit greater pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Nokia 7.2 has a little bit more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little better processing power than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better camera than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor taking much lower quality videos and pictures, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way better video quality.
Nokia 7.2 has just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.