Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 3 is much better than the Nokia 7.2, getting a general score of 85.6 against 75.9. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 3 has newer 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10, so it gives a couple nice extra features and performance optimizations. Galaxy Z Flip 3's body is newer and thinner, but a bit heavier than the Nokia 7.2.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with just a little better processing power than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better looking display than Nokia 7.2, because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution, a bit larger screen and a just a little greater display density.
Nokia 7.2 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Nokia 7.2 also has a way better resolution back-facing camera. The Nokia 7.2 has a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia 7.2 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
Nokia 7.2 counts with a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 6% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.