Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a lot better than Nokia 7.2, having a overall score of 92.3 against 75.9. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a newer and thinner cellphone than the Nokia 7.2, but it's also a little heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a bit better display than Nokia 7.2, because it has a little bigger display, a little greater display density and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels. The Nokia 7.2 features a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit more powerful CPU than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 MP resolution and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lot worse quality images, and they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Nokia 7.2 counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.