Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Nokia 7.2, getting a 94.6 score against 75.9. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version, offering some extra features. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and somewhat thinner, but much heavier than Nokia 7.2.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processing unit than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Nokia 7.2 count with similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bigger screen.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less megapixels, and they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a bigger sensor which provides a better photo and video quality and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Nokia 7.2 has a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with longer battery performance than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.