Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-30 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a score of 90.6, which is better than the Nokia 7.2's 75.9 score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is heavier than the Nokia 7.2, it's thinner and newer. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has the newer 11 version and Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version, so it gives you a couple additional features.
Nokia 7.2 features just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little greater pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a bit better performance than Nokia 7.2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM.
Nokia 7.2 shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a camera with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture. Nokia 7.2 has slightly more memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has improved battery duration than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 26% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.