| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| Glass and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy A35 5G has a general score of 79.4, which is a bit better than Nokia 7.3's 76.9 general score. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has the newer 14 version while Nokia 7.3 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy A35 5G body has the same thickness than Nokia 7.3, but it's heavier.
Nokia 7.3 has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G. Both have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit more vivid display than Nokia 7.3, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Nokia 7.3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A35 5G has a camera that's very similar to Nokia 7.3's camera, and although the Galaxy A35 5G has a larger sensor shooting higher quality photos and a more mega-pixels back camera, they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy A35 5G has better battery performance than Nokia 7.3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.