Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than Nokia 7.3, getting an 88.5 score against 76.9. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Nokia 7.3 has Android 11 version, providing you a couple additional features and performance improvements.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better display than Nokia 7.3, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little bit better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen. Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better hardware performance than Nokia 7.3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 7.3, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Nokia 7.3 has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. Nokia 7.3 features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Nokia 7.3 also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.