Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than Nokia 7.3, getting a global score of 92.3 against 76.9. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give you the same OS features. Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia 7.3, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 7.3, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a little bit higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 7.3, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Nokia 7.3 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Nokia 7.3 also counts with a way bigger sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
The Nokia 7.3 has better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.