Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.9 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| -- | 9.56 ounces |
| -- | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619L GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is better than the Nokia 7.3, with a 90.6 score against 76.9. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Nokia 7.3 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a bit superior processor than Nokia 7.3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The Nokia 7.3 captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Nokia 7.3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit superior battery life than Nokia 7.3, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.