Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-03-07 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.38 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Nokia 7 plus, getting a overall score of 88.5 against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body has the same weight than the Nokia 7 plus, but it is much thinner. The Nokia 7 plus counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower 1080 x 2160px resolution and a quite worse count of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior CPU than Nokia 7 plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 7 plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better camera than Nokia 7 plus, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, a 12 MP resolution camera, the same sensor size and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has better 60 fps video frame rate. Nokia 7 plus features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 15% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.