Search


Compare phones

Global Score
22.940
Basic Information
NokiaBlackberry
--BlackBerry 7.1
--2012-04-18
4.90 x 2.10 x 0.95 inches4.29 x 2.36 x 0.50 inches
4.90 ounces3.60 ounces
$ 60.00$ 60.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
95 x 65 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
2.85.8
processor processor
--512 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.85
Storage
--524,29 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
02.42
Camera
--2.00 MP
04.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--SIM
02.8
Battery Life
600mAh Li-Polymer Battery1450mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
145 hours standby time
2.6 hours talk time
432 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
1.923.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--
--Light Sensor

Comparison review

The BlackBerry Curve 9220 is way better than Nokia 7160, with a 40 score against 22.9. BlackBerry Curve 9220's design is a lot lighter and much thinner than Nokia 7160. BlackBerry Curve 9220 has a much better screen than Nokia 7160, because it has a much better resolution of 240 x 320 pixels. BlackBerry Curve 9220 counts with a little bit better performance than Nokia 7160, because it has a larger number of cores.

BlackBerry Curve 9220 has a way better camera than Nokia 7160. BlackBerry Curve 9220 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 7160, because it has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB. The BlackBerry Curve 9220 has a really longer battery duration than Nokia 7160, because it has 1450mAh of battery capacity.

BlackBerry Curve 9220 and the Nokia 7160 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.