Search


Compare phones

Global Score
22.939
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
--Symbian 9.4
--2010-08-24
4.90 x 2.10 x 0.95 inches4.09 x 1.93 x 0.55 inches
4.90 ounces3.77 ounces
--Blue, Gray, Purple, Red and White
$ 60.00$ 59.00
Display / Screen
--2.8 inches
95 x 65 pixels 360 x 640 pixels
--TFT
--262 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
2.87.2
processorARM11 (Single-Core 434 MHz) processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.48
Storage
--52,22 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
01.4
Camera
--2.00 MP
--640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution
05.28
--EDGE and GSM
--SIM
00.3
Battery Life
600mAh Li-Polymer Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
145 hours standby time
2.6 hours talk time
450 hours standby time
7.7 hours talk time
1.922.56
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
Infra-red port--
--Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

The Nokia 5250 is way better than Nokia 7160, with a global score of 39 against 22.9. The Nokia 5250 is a noticeably lighter and notably thinner device than the Nokia 7160. The Nokia 5250 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Nokia 7160, because it has a way better resolution of 640 x 360px.

The Nokia 5250 features a superior processing unit than Nokia 7160, because it has a higher number of cores. Nokia 5250 features a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 7160, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 16 GB. The Nokia 5250 features a much better camera than Nokia 7160.

The Nokia 5250 counts with a very superior battery performance than Nokia 7160, because it has a 67% more battery capacity.

Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Nokia 5250 is also cheaper, making it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.