Compare phones
Samsung C3590
C3590| Global Score | |
| 22.9 | 39.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 4.90 x 2.10 x 0.95 inches | 3.97 x 2.00 x 0.68 inches |
| 4.90 ounces | 3.52 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 60.00 | $ 60.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 2.4 inches |
| 95 x 65 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| -- | TFT |
| -- | 167 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 6.1 |
| processor | Single-Core 416 MHz processor |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.57 |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 2.00 MP |
| 0 | 4.73 |
| -- | EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 145 hours standby time 2.6 hours talk time | 460 hours standby time 12 hours talk time |
| 1.92 | 2.24 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| Infra-red port | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung C3590 has a global score of 39.7, which is much better than the Nokia 7160's score of 22.9. The Samsung C3590 body is lighter and way thinner than Nokia 7160. The Samsung C3590 has a lot better display than Nokia 7160, because it has a much better resolution of 320 x 240 pixels. Samsung C3590 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Nokia 7160, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 32 GB.
The Samsung C3590 has a faster processing unit than Nokia 7160, because it has a higher number of faster cores and an extra GPU. Samsung C3590 features superior battery life than Nokia 7160, because it has a 33% bigger battery size. Samsung C3590 shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia 7160.
The Samsung C3590 and the Nokia 7160 cost the same, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.