Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 25.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-03-12 | 2008-01-07 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.69 inches | 3.70 x 1.70 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.93 ounces | 3.30 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | microSD external memory slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 9 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.48 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola W270 is a bit better than the Nokia 7210, getting a overall score of 25.6 against 24.1. Motorola W270's construction is a lot newer and thinner, but also heavier than the Nokia 7210. The Motorola W270 features a processing unit that is very similar to Nokia 7210's processing unit, both have 0 cores.
The Motorola W270 counts with a bit sharper screen than Nokia 7210. Both of them have exactly the same 128 x 128 resolution. The Motorola W270's camera is just as good as the Nokia 7210 one. The Motorola W270 has as much memory to install applications and games as the Nokia 7210. Motorola W270 has greater battery life than Nokia 7210, because it has a 31% more battery size.
The Motorola W270 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.