Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| 2002-03-12 | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.69 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 2.93 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.32 |
| -- | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola W315 has a score of 24.7, which is a little bit better than Nokia 7210's 24.1 global score. Although Motorola W315 is notably newer than Nokia 7210, it's just a little heavier and thicker. Motorola W315 counts with just a bit better screen than Nokia 7210, because it has a little bit higher 160 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola W315 and Nokia 7210 count with similar processing units, both have a 0-Core CPU. The Motorola W315 features as much memory capacity for apps and games as Nokia 7210. The Motorola W315 features improved battery life than Nokia 7210, because it has an 18 percent larger battery size. The Motorola W315 and Nokia 7210 both feature extremely similar cameras.
Motorola W315 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.