Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.1 | 26 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Nokia |
| 2002-03-12 | 2005-06-03 |
| 4.17 x 1.77 x 0.69 inches | 4.09 x 1.77 x 0.67 inches |
| 2.93 ounces | 3.00 ounces |
| $ 135.00 | $ 100.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 96 x 68 pixels |
| LCD | -- |
| -- | 65 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 4.6 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| GPRS and GSM | GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 720mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 450 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.4 |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 1600 is slightly better than the Nokia 7210, having a 26 score against 24.1. Nokia 1600 is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner phone than Nokia 7210, although it is just a little bit heavier. The Nokia 1600 has a much better looking screen than Nokia 7210, although it has a lot worse resolution of 68 x 96px.
The Nokia 1600 has as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as Nokia 7210. The Nokia 1600 counts with a processor that's very similar to the processing unit in Nokia 7210, they have the same number of cores. Nokia 1600 and Nokia 7210 feature incredibly similar cameras. The Nokia 1600 has superior battery lifetime than Nokia 7210, because it has a 25% larger battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Nokia 1600 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.