Search


Compare phones

Global Score
34.437.6
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2009-11-242010-11-29
3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches4.59 x 2.11 x 0.59 inches
3.53 ounces3.81 ounces
Gray and PinkBlack
$ 265.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
2.4 inches2.4 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
65.8
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
71,68 MB internal memory102,4 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot
0.51.6
Camera
3.20 MP2.00 MP
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution--
5.394.73
UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.40.1
Battery Life
860mAh Li-Ion Battery1140mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
370 hours standby time
5.4 hours talk time
288 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.322.8
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Samsung Profile is a little bit better than Nokia 7230, having a 37.6 score against 34.4. Even though Samsung Profile is newer than Nokia 7230, it is a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Nokia 7230 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Profile. They have a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen, a same size display and the same 320 x 240 resolution.

Samsung Profile counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 7230, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Profile has a CPU that is very similar to Nokia 7230's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores. Nokia 7230 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Profile, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.

Samsung Profile features a much better battery duration than Nokia 7230, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.

Samsung Profile not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.