Global Score | |
34.4 | 37.6 |
Basic Information | |
Nokia | Samsung |
2009-11-24 | 2010-11-29 |
3.86 x 1.89 x 0.58 inches | 4.59 x 2.11 x 0.59 inches |
3.53 ounces | 3.81 ounces |
Gray and Pink | Black |
$ 265.00 | $ 100.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.4 inches | 2.4 inches |
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
167 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | No touch screen |
6 | 5.8 |
processor | processor |
GPU | GPU |
5.76 | 5.76 |
Storage | |
71,68 MB internal memory | 102,4 MB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
0.5 | 1.6 |
Camera | |
3.20 MP | 2.00 MP |
320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | -- |
5.39 | 4.73 |
UMTS, EDGE and GSM | CDMA |
SIM | -- |
0.4 | 0.1 |
Battery Life | |
860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1140mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
370 hours standby time 5.4 hours talk time | 288 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
2.32 | 2.8 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
-- | GPS |
FM Radio | -- |
The Samsung Profile is a little bit better than Nokia 7230, having a 37.6 score against 34.4. Even though Samsung Profile is newer than Nokia 7230, it is a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Nokia 7230 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Profile. They have a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen, a same size display and the same 320 x 240 resolution.
Samsung Profile counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 7230, because it has more internal storage capacity. Samsung Profile has a CPU that is very similar to Nokia 7230's processing unit, both of them have the same number of cores. Nokia 7230 shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Profile, because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Samsung Profile features a much better battery duration than Nokia 7230, because it has a 33 percent larger battery size.
Samsung Profile not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.