Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.142.3
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
--Windows Mobile Standard 6.1
2004-09-102009-06-25
4.13 x 1.77 x 0.70 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
3.25 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.32.9
Battery Life
760mAh Li-Ion Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
2.163.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
Infra-red port--
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The HTC Ozone has a global score of 42.3, which is way better than the Nokia 7260's global score of 28.1. The HTC Ozone construction is notably newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Nokia 7260. HTC Ozone features an incredibly better looking display than Nokia 7260, because it has a much better resolution of 240 x 320.

Nokia 7260 and HTC Ozone both feature similar memory for applications and games. The HTC Ozone counts with a superior processing unit than Nokia 7260, because it has a larger number of cores. The HTC Ozone counts with a really longer battery duration than Nokia 7260, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.

The HTC Ozone shoots greater videos and photos than Nokia 7260, because it has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.

HTC Ozone and the Nokia 7260 cost exactly the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.