Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.143.5
Basic Information
NokiaNokia
2004-09-102012-02-27
4.13 x 1.77 x 0.70 inches4.54 x 2.32 x 0.53 inches
3.25 ounces3.74 ounces
--Black, Blue, Gray, Red and Yellow
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
128 x 128 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
36.2
processor Single-Core 1000 MHz processor
--128 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.767.29
Storage
--102,4 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
01.92
Camera
0.30 MP3.20 MP
--640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution
3.635.5
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
0.33.6
Battery Life
760mAh Li-Ion Battery1430mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
350 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
707 hours standby time
9 hours talk time
2.163.2
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
Infra-red port--
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Nokia Asha 302 is way better than Nokia 7260, with a score of 43.5 against 28.1. Nokia Asha 302's body is notably newer and much thinner than the Nokia 7260's, but it is heavier. The Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much powerful CPU than Nokia 7260, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster).

The Nokia Asha 302 has a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 7260, because it has a much better resolution of 240 x 320. Nokia Asha 302 takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia 7260, because it has a camera in the back with lot more megapixels. Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than Nokia 7260, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB.

Nokia Asha 302 counts with a much better battery duration than Nokia 7260, because it has an 88 percent greater battery capacity.

Nokia Asha 302 costs exactly the same than the Nokia 7260.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.