Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.931.7
Basic Information
NokiaKyocera
2006-09-042011-07-25
3.46 x 1.69 x 0.90 inches4.00 x 2.10 x 1.00 inches
3.66 ounces5.10 ounces
$ 269.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.16.1
Performance
--Qualcomm QSC6085 chipset
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.41.32
Camera
2.00 MP3.20 MP
4.735.06
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery1360mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
2.5 hours talk time
8.1 hours talk time
2.083.12
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Kyocera DuraMax is slightly better than the Nokia 7373, getting a 31.7 score against 28.9. The Kyocera DuraMax body is incredibly newer than Nokia 7373's, but it is thicker and way heavier. Kyocera DuraMax features a much more vibrant screen than Nokia 7373. Both of them have an equal resolution of 320 x 240px.

Kyocera DuraMax counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 7373. The Kyocera DuraMax counts with a CPU that is just as good as the Nokia 7373 one, both have 0 processing cores. Kyocera DuraMax features just a bit better camera than Nokia 7373, because it has a camera with a lot better 3.2 mega-pixels resolution.

The Kyocera DuraMax counts with a much longer battery duration than Nokia 7373, because it has 1360mAh of battery capacity.

Kyocera DuraMax not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making this phone an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.