Search


Compare phones

Global Score
28.931.6
Basic Information
NokiaMotorola
--Windows Mobile Standard 5.0
2006-09-042005-07-26
3.46 x 1.69 x 0.90 inches4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches
3.66 ounces4.06 ounces
$ 269.00$ 165.00
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
No touch screenNo touch screen
3.13
processor processor
--64 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory--
microSD external memory slotminiSD external memory slot
0.40
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
4.734.51
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
700mAh Li-Ion Battery Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
2.5 hours talk time
--
2.081.36
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth
--Infra-red port
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Motorola Q GSM has a global score of 31.6, which is just a bit better than Nokia 7373's score of 28.9. The Motorola Q GSM is an older and a bit heavier device than the Nokia 7373, but Motorola could make it a lot thinner anyway. Motorola Q GSM and Nokia 7373 count with really similar processors, they have the same number of cores.

Nokia 7373 features a little sharper screen than Motorola Q GSM. They have the same exact 240 x 320 resolution. Nokia 7373 counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Motorola Q GSM, although it has no slot for SD memory cards. Nokia 7373 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Q GSM.

Nokia 7373 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Q GSM, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola Q GSM is also very cheap compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.