Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.9 | 31.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Palm |
| -- | Palm OS 5.4 |
| 2006-09-04 | 2006-10-12 |
| 3.46 x 1.69 x 0.90 inches | 4.40 x 2.30 x 0.80 inches |
| 3.66 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| $ 269.00 | $ 125.00 |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 320 x 320 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| -- | 206 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Resistive |
| 3.1 | 6.3 |
| processor | Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 312 MHz) processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32,77 MB internal memory | 65,54 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | MMC, SD external memory slot |
| 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 0.30 MP |
| -- | 352 x 288 video resolution |
| 4.73 | 3.63 |
| EDGE and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 250 hours standby time 2.5 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time |
| 2.08 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 1.2 |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Palm Treo 680 is just a bit better than the Nokia 7373, with a score of 31.4 against 28.9. Palm Treo 680's body is thinner but a lot heavier than Nokia 7373, and they were only released with a few months difference. Palm Treo 680 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Nokia 7373, because it has more cpu cores.
The Palm Treo 680 counts with a way better looking display than Nokia 7373, because it has a bit higher resolution of 320 x 320px. The Palm Treo 680 has a superior storage for applications and games than Nokia 7373, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 32,77 MB more internal storage.
Nokia 7373 shoots much better videos and photos than Palm Treo 680, because it has a camera with much more mega-pixels. Palm Treo 680 has a superior battery performance than Nokia 7373, because it has 1200mAh of battery capacity instead of 700mAh.
The Palm Treo 680 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.