Search


Compare phones

Global Score
33.336.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2006-09-042008-09-10
3.54 x 1.85 x 0.74 inches4.50 x 2.10 x 0.70 inches
4.05 ounces4.58 ounces
$ 269.00$ 170.00
Display / Screen
--2.1 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
167 pixels per inch134 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.35.7
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
21,5 MB internal memory32,77 MB internal memory
microSD external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30.4
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
5.064.73
UMTS, EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.40.1
Battery Life
Li-Ion Battery960mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
220 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
5.6 hours talk time
1.362.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth 2.0
--GPS
Infra-red port--
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Samsung Rant is a little bit better than the Nokia 7390, with a 36.4 score against 33.3. Samsung Rant's body is much newer and a bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than Nokia 7390. Nokia 7390 features a more vivid display than Samsung Rant, because it has a quite better pixels count per inch in the screen and a better 320 x 240px resolution.

Samsung Rant has a much better storage for apps and games than Nokia 7390, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 11,27 MB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Rant has a CPU that's very similar to the Nokia 7390 one, both have a 0-Core processing unit. Nokia 7390 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Rant, because it has a back-facing camera with a way higher 3 mega-pixels resolution.

Samsung Rant has a really longer battery life than Nokia 7390.

Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Rant is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.