Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3437.4
Basic Information
NokiaSamsung
2008-06-272007-10-30
3.64 x 1.83 x 0.66 inches3.90 x 1.90 x 0.60 inches
4.37 ounces3.16 ounces
$ 185.00$ 150.00
Display / Screen
2.2 inches--
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)176 x 220 pixels
TFTTFT
182 pixels per inch157 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.45.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
25,6 MB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD external memory slot
0.30.4
Camera
2.00 MP1.30 MP
640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution--
5.174.51
EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.9
Battery Life
870mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
300 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
240 hours standby time
3 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.0

Comparison review

The Samsung SGH-A737 has a score of 37.4, which is slightly better than the Nokia 7510 Supernova's global score of 34. The Samsung SGH-A737 is a just a little bit thinner and way lighter cellphone than Nokia 7510 Supernova, even when both were only released with a few months difference. The Nokia 7510 Supernova counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a higher 320 x 240 resolution and a just a little more pixels per display inch.

Samsung SGH-A737 features a processor that is very similar to Nokia 7510 Supernova's processing unit, both have 0 cpu cores. Nokia 7510 Supernova features a superior camera than Samsung SGH-A737, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher 2 megapixels resolution. Samsung SGH-A737 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 7510 Supernova, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 51,2 MB internal memory.

Samsung SGH-A737 has a bit superior battery performance than Nokia 7510 Supernova, because it has 1000mAh of battery capacity against 870mAh.

Samsung SGH-A737 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.