Search


Compare phones

Global Score
2842.3
Basic Information
NokiaHTC
Symbian 7.0sWindows Mobile Standard 6.1
2003-10-272009-06-25
5.27 x 3.15 x 0.87 inches4.50 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches
6.46 ounces3.70 ounces
$ 70.00$ 70.00
Display / Screen
--2.4 inches
640 x 320 pixels 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
--167 pixels per inch
ResistiveNo touch screen
3.16
processor Single-Core 528 MHz processor
--192 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.766.66
Storage
25,6 MB internal memory--
MMC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.30
Camera
0.30 MP2.00 MP
3.634.73
Networks
--Wi-Fi
EDGE and GSMEV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA
SIMSIM
0.32.9
Battery Life
1300mAh Li-Polymer Battery1500mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
264 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
324 hours standby time
4.8 hours talk time
3.043.28
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0, EDR
--GPS
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The HTC Ozone has a general score of 42.3, which is way better than the Nokia 7700's 28 overall score. HTC Ozone's body is much newer, incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner than Nokia 7700. HTC Ozone has Windows Mobile Standard 6.1 OS, and Nokia 7700 counts with Symbian 7.0s OS. The HTC Ozone features a better processor than Nokia 7700, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster).

The HTC Ozone features a much better looking display than Nokia 7700, although it has a lot worse 240 x 320 resolution. The Nokia 7700 has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than HTC Ozone, although it has no slot for external memory cards. HTC Ozone features just a bit better battery performance than Nokia 7700, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity.

The HTC Ozone takes a lot better photos and videos than Nokia 7700, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels.

The HTC Ozone and the Nokia 7700 cost exactly the same, making it an easy choice.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.