Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Polar night | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G, having a global score of 88.1 against 80.5. Even though the Apple iPhone X is noticeably older than Nokia 8.3 5G, it's body is somewhat thinner and way lighter. IPhone X counts with a much better looking display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a bit greater pixel count per display inch.
Nokia 8.3 5G features just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone X, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The iPhone X counts with a little bit better performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a way better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 2716mAh. The iPhone X's camera is very similar to the Nokia 8.3 5G one, because although the iPhone X has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, a worse (4K) video quality and a lot smaller back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia 8.3 5G. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.