Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Polar night | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, getting a score of 82.5 against 80.5. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is thinner and lighter than Nokia 8.3 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Nokia 8.3 5G has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a slightly better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px. Nokia 8.3 5G features a much greater memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Nokia 8.3 5G has greater battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 28 percent more battery capacity. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.