Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Polar night | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 387 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is a bit better than HTC One M9, with an 80.5 score against 77.7. Although the Nokia 8.3 5G is heavier than the HTC One M9, it's a bit thinner and also way newer. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8.3 5G has newer 11 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it offers a lot of extra features.
HTC One M9 has a better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
HTC One M9 has just a bit better performance than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processing unit and a 64-bits CPU. Nokia 8.3 5G features a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
The HTC One M9's camera is just as good as the camera in Nokia 8.3 5G, and although the HTC One M9 has a worse video quality, a way less mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited situations, they both have the same back camera sensor size.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One M9. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the HTC One M9, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.