Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-09-23 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Polar night | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, getting an 82.5 score against 80.5. The LG V30S ThinQ design is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the Nokia 8.3 5G, although it was released many years before. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V30S ThinQ's CPU is just as good as the CPU in Nokia 8.3 5G, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a little bit better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
LG V30S ThinQ features a much better memory for games and applications than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Nokia 8.3 5G has superior battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Nokia 8.3 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.