Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Polar night | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is a bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G, getting a general score of 81.3 against 80.5. LG V35 ThinQ's design is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it was released 2 years before. LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ has a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a way larger sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
Nokia 8.3 5G has greater battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG V35 ThinQ is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.