Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-23 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Polar night | Black, Gold and Gray |
| $ 449.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G has an overall score of 80.5, which is a little bit better than the Moto Z Force's 75.8 score. The Nokia 8.3 5G body is newer, but thicker and way heavier than the Moto Z Force. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Nokia 8.3 5G has 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Moto Z Force features a little more vivid display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen pixels density.
Moto Z Force features a little bit more storage for games and applications than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Nokia 8.3 5G takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking photographs in low-light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Nokia 8.3 5G has superior battery duration than Moto Z Force, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z Force. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto Z Force, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.