Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-09-23 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Polar night | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8.3 5G is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a global score of 80.5 against 77.6. Even though Nokia 8.3 5G is much newer than Motorola Moto Z3, it is a lot heavier and a lot thicker. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but Nokia 8.3 5G has older 11 version while Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit superior processor than Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bit better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Nokia 8.3 5G has a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures and video.
Moto Z3 counts with a little bit more storage for apps and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 50 percent larger battery size.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Moto Z3. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto Z3, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.