Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Polar night | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G's 80.5 score. Galaxy A50's body is a lot lighter and thinner than Nokia 8.3 5G, although it was released only 19 months before. The Galaxy A50 has a little bit better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Nokia 8.3 5G, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a back-facing camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, a much lower (Full HD) video resolution and a tinier sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light environments.
The Galaxy A50's storage to install games and applications is just as good as Nokia 8.3 5G's one, both of them have the same internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.