Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Polar night | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is a bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, having a global score of 85.5 against 80.5. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A51 is older than the Nokia 8.3 5G, it's construction is a lot lighter and thinner. Both of these devices include the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a bit sharper display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density. The Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A51, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 takes much better videos and photos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lower video quality, a way less megapixels resolution camera and a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and video in low light environments, it also counts with a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
Galaxy A51's storage capacity to store more games and applications is just as good as Nokia 8.3 5G's one, they have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A51 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.