Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Polar night | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Nokia 8.3 5G, having a 90.7 score against 80.5. The Galaxy A52 construction is somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than Nokia 8.3 5G, even though they were released only 6 months apart. The Nokia 8.3 5G features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a bit sharper display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a little greater pixels number per screen inch. Galaxy A52 has a bit more memory capacity for applications and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a much better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same resolution back-facing camera, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A52's battery performance is just as good as Nokia 8.3 5G's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.