Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Polar night | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Nokia 8.3 5G's 80.5 global score. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version while Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11 version. Although the Galaxy A52 5G and Nokia 8.3 5G were released with only 6 months difference, the Galaxy A52 5G is lighter and just a bit thinner.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G has a better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same video frame rate and a same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
The Galaxy A52 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to Nokia 8.3 5G's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.