Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-23 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Polar night | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8.3 5G is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A70, getting a score of 80.5 against 76.9. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Nokia 8.3 5G has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it offers lots of additional features. The Nokia 8.3 5G is a newer device than the Samsung Galaxy A70, but it is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nokia 8.3 5G and Samsung Galaxy A70 both have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density.
The Nokia 8.3 5G and the Samsung Galaxy A70 have similar memory to install applications and games, both have an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB and the same internal storage. The Galaxy A70 features a battery performance that's very similar to the Nokia 8.3 5G one. Nokia 8.3 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Nokia 8.3 5G also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
Although Nokia 8.3 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A70, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.