Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-23 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Polar night | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Nokia 8.3 5G, getting a 97.6 score against 80.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is incredibly thinner than the Nokia 8.3 5G, although it is somewhat heavier and was released around 12 months before. These phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11 version, offering lots of additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better processing power than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold and Nokia 8.3 5G count with quite similar displays, because although the Galaxy Fold has a little inferior pixel count in each inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Nokia 8.3 5G features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
The Galaxy Fold features just a bit better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and duller colors and a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a much larger aperture for better captures in low light environments.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 8.3 5G. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy Nokia 8.3 5G, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.