Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-23 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Polar night | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 387 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, getting a 90.8 score against 80.5. The Galaxy Note 20 is a lighter and just a little thinner cellphone than the Nokia 8.3 5G, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit faster processor than Nokia 8.3 5G. They have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a little bit better looking display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a quite greater pixel number per inch in the screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The Nokia 8.3 5G features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5 percent more battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Nokia 8.3 5G. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Nokia 8.3 5G, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.