Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-23 | -- |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 8.01 ounces | -- |
| Polar night | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Nokia 8.3 5G's overall score of 80.5. Both devices in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version while Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy S25's design is much thinner and incredibly lighter than the Nokia 8.3 5G.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a lot better display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with an extremely better processing unit than Galaxy S25. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Nokia 8.3 5G features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S25, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy S25 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a lot less MP back facing camera, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a bigger aperture and a way larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Nokia 8.3 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S25, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.