Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-23 | -- |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 8.01 ounces | -- |
| Polar night | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Nokia 8.3 5G, with a score of 90.7 against 80.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11, so it offers a lot of extra features. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a much thinner and incredibly lighter cellphone than Nokia 8.3 5G.
The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a much powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a much better screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S25 Ultra also has a greater pixels number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088px.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a very superior camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has a lot better video resolution, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in low-light situations and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor. The Nokia 8.3 5G counts with just a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a bit better battery life than Nokia 8.3 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.