Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Polar night | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Nokia 8.3 5G, with a score of 88.5 against 80.5. Although Galaxy Z Flip and Nokia 8.3 5G were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy Z Flip is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Nokia 8.3 5G has Android 11, providing a lot of extra features and better performance.
Galaxy Z Flip has a little faster processor than Nokia 8.3 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Galaxy Z Flip features a little sharper display than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly better camera than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much worse resolution, a smaller back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos and videos.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia 8.3 5G features better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia 8.3 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Nokia 8.3 5G, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.