Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.5 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-23 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.01 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Polar night | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is much better than the Nokia 8.3 5G's score of 80.5. Both phones in this review come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Nokia 8.3 5G were released with only a couple of months difference, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is heavier but also extremely thinner than Nokia 8.3 5G.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen and a better 1768 x 2208 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a bit better processor than Nokia 8.3 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a worse video resolution and a way worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photography and a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures.
Nokia 8.3 5G counts with a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery duration is very similar to the battery duration in Nokia 8.3 5G.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Nokia 8.3 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Nokia 8.3 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Nokia 8.3 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.