Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Apple |
| 2018-04-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, getting an 84.2 score against 74.2. Apple iPhone XS is a incredibly heavier phone than the Nokia 8 Sirocco, but both of them are equally thin. The iPhone XS counts with a bit superior processing unit than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS has a little more vivid screen than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a bit worse 1125 x 2436px resolution and a little bit lower pixels number per inch of screen, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB more internal memory.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with improved battery performance than iPhone XS, because it has 3260mAh of battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. The iPhone XS counts with a much better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos in low light environments, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality, a back camera with a 12 MP resolution and a same size back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.