Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| 2018-04-20 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel is slightly better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, with a global score of 80.2 against 74.2. Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a bit better display than Google Pixel, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution, a bit bigger screen and a bit greater screen pixel density. Nokia 8 Sirocco has a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
Nokia 8 Sirocco features a little better performance than Google Pixel, because it has a higher amount of RAM and more CPU cores. The Google Pixel shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher resolution and a larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco features superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has an 18% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.