Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than Nokia 8 Sirocco, getting a score of 82.9 against 74.2. The Nokia 8 Sirocco has just a bit better performance than Google Pixel 4a. They have a 6 GB RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater count of pixels in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Nokia 8 Sirocco has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 4a has a much better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same sensor size, the Google Pixel 4a also has a camera in the back with more megapixels.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a little longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.