Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is better than Nokia 8 Sirocco's score of 74.2. Nokia 8 Sirocco features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels number in each inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Nokia 8 Sirocco has a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a 5G. Both of them have 8 cores and a 6 GB RAM. Nokia 8 Sirocco features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia 8 Sirocco also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a lot better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, a same size sensor, the same video frame rate and the same diafragm aperture, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a better resolution back-facing camera. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with superior battery duration than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 3885mAh battery capacity against 3260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.