Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | HTC |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has an overall score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's 74.2 global score. HTC One M9 features a bit superior processor than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional GPU and a 64 bits processor.
The HTC One M9 features a bit more vivid display than Nokia 8 Sirocco, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower display density and a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080. The HTC One M9 counts with a much better camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the HTC One M9 also counts with a lot better 20 megapixels resolution camera and a larger sensor providing a better image quality.
Nokia 8 Sirocco counts with a superior storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Nokia 8 Sirocco has just a little better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 3260mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.