Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-20 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.55 x 2.87 x 0.30 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3260mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is much better than the Nokia 8 Sirocco's overall score of 74.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better display than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger screen.
The Nokia 8 Sirocco has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior camera than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels and a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery lifetime than Nokia 8 Sirocco, because it has a 32 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.